Rear-End Collision
California Vehicle Code Section 21703 prohibits following too closely and creates a presumption that the rear driver is at fault in a rear-end collision. This presumption shifts the burden t...
Rear-End Collision guide →Being rear-ended by a commercial truck creates both higher injury severity — due to the extreme mass differential — and a richer liability landscape than a passenger vehicle rear-end. FMCSA regulations apply to the truck driver and carrier:
This page provides general legal information about rear-ended by a commercial truck claims in California. It is not legal advice. Consult a licensed California attorney for guidance specific to your situation.
Being rear-ended by a commercial truck creates both higher injury severity — due to the extreme mass differential — and a richer liability landscape than a passenger vehicle rear-end. FMCSA regulations apply to the truck driver and carrier: hours-of-service limits (49 CFR Part 395), ELD records, pre-trip brake inspection requirements (49 CFR Part 396), and minimum insurance of $750,000 (49 CFR Section 387.9).
California rear-end collision law is governed primarily by Vehicle Code Section 21703 (following too closely), the rebuttable presumption of fault against the rear driver, and California's pure comparative fault system from Li v. Yellow Cab Co. (1975). The victim's recovery encompasses all economic damages (medical expenses, lost wages, property damage) and non-economic damages (pain and suffering, emotional distress) without any cap under California personal injury law.
California Vehicle Code Section 21703 prohibits following another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent. In a rear-end collision, a rebuttable presumption arises that the following driver violated this statute. The following driver must produce evidence to rebut the presumption — typically a sudden, unexpected stop by the lead driver or an emergency — failing which the presumption stands and establishes the following driver's negligence.
"The driver of a motor vehicle shall not follow another vehicle more closely than is reasonable and prudent, having due regard for the speed of such vehicle and the traffic upon, and the condition of, the roadway."
California's pure comparative fault system allows recovery even if the rear-end victim was partly at fault — for example, by stopping abruptly or driving with non-functional brake lights. The victim's recovery is reduced proportionally by their fault percentage but is not eliminated. In multi-vehicle rear-end cases, Proposition 51 (Civil Code Section 1431.2) allocates non-economic damages among defendants proportionally while maintaining joint and several liability for economic damages.
California rear-ended by a commercial truck victims can recover: all past and future medical expenses; lost wages and earning capacity; vehicle property damage including diminished value; non-economic damages (pain, suffering, emotional distress, loss of enjoyment of life) — uncapped in California; and punitive damages under Civil Code Section 3294 when the rear driver's conduct constitutes malice (DUI, intentional brake-check, reckless speed).
Two years from the date of the accident under CCP Section 335.1. Government entity claims: six months under Government Code Section 945.4. Minor victims: tolled until age 18 under CCP Section 352. Missing these deadlines permanently bars the claim.
Under CVC Section 21703 and FMCSA following-distance regulations, there is a strong presumption of negligence against a commercial truck driver who rear-ends a passenger vehicle. The truck driver and motor carrier must demonstrate a sudden emergency or mechanical failure to rebut this presumption. The FMCSA-required ELD records, EDR data, and maintenance history are critical evidence.
FMCSA regulations under 49 CFR Section 387.9 require minimum liability insurance of $750,000 for commercial vehicles carrying general freight in interstate commerce. This is far above California's personal auto minimums of $30,000/$60,000. Many large carriers maintain policies well above this minimum plus umbrella coverage.
An electronic logging device automatically records the truck driver's hours of service, driving time, location, and vehicle speed. In a truck rear-end accident, ELD records establish whether the driver violated hours-of-service limits, was fatigued, and the vehicle's speed history. A written preservation demand must be sent to the carrier immediately after the accident.
Yes. The motor carrier is vicariously liable for its driver's negligence under respondeat superior. The motor carrier also faces direct negligence claims for FMCSA compliance failures — including inadequate pre-trip brake inspections and dispatching a fatigued driver. Multiple defendants improve the chances of full recovery.
A loaded semi-truck weighs up to 80,000 pounds compared to 3,000-4,000 pounds for a passenger vehicle. The kinetic energy differential means that even a relatively low-speed truck rear-impact produces catastrophic structural damage and severe occupant injuries. Cervical spine injuries, traumatic brain injury, and spinal cord injury are far more common when the rear-end vehicle is a commercial truck.
Two years from the date of the accident under CCP Section 335.1. ELD records, EDR data, and carrier dispatch communications are subject to deletion under carrier retention policies — a written preservation demand must be sent immediately. Government entity truck claims: six months under Government Code Section 945.4.
California Vehicle Code Section 21703 prohibits following too closely and creates a presumption that the rear driver is at fault in a rear-end collision. This presumption shifts the burden t...
Rear-End Collision guide →Whiplash is the most common injury in rear-end collisions, caused by the sudden hyperextension-then-flexion motion of the neck and spine. Despite its frequency, whiplash is one of the most c...
Whiplash / Soft-Tissue Injury guide →Multi-vehicle chain-reaction rear-end pileups create complex liability questions: which driver's initial impact caused the chain reaction, how liability is allocated among multiple drivers w...
Chain-Reaction / Multi-Car Pileup guide →